Snow frosted mountains

First Judicial District Court

a

Explore Section

Division V Schedule

Honorable Jason Lidyard

Last Updated: 9/24/2021

In-Person Hearings

Pursuant to the New Mexico Supreme Court Order No. 21-8500-015 effective July 19, 2021, the following types of hearings will be conducted in person, absent a court order requiring remote proceedings:

1) Pretrial Detention, or Dangerousness Hearings 2) Preliminary Examinations or Preliminary Hearings, 3) Competency Evidentiary hearings, 4) Pleas (only for current case, no PV in-custody pleas), 5) Sentencing (only for current case, no PV in-custody pleas), 6) Bench Trials (lower court appeals and jury trials that turn into bench trials), 7) Probation Violation (evidentiary hearings only for out of custody and jail time sought – No Status – In custody do not come for status, evidentiary hearings, pleas or sentencing).  Parties may request in person and such requests are subject to approval of the presiding judge and the chief judge.

NOTICE ON REMOTE ACCESS TO COURT PROCEEDINGS

For Telephone call-in by all parties dial 1-651-504-5687 and enter the corresponding pin 492 868 159#

If you would like to appear by video: https://meet.google.com/bjm-kjbo-xfy

NOTICE

Dear attorneys:

The criminal judges in the First Judicial District Court have established the following general protocols. These may change as appropriate and we will certainly advise you immediately of any changes.

  1. Attorneys may appear by phone and their clients need not be present in court for the following hearings, subject to the conditions stated:
    1. Attorneys must make an email request in writing to the Judge’s TCAA at least 24 hours in advance, which email must contain the telephone number at which the attorney can be reached. Attorneys must be available at least five minutes before the scheduled hearing and continue to be available until the attorney receives a telephone call from the Court.
    2. Status conference on competency evaluations. Attorneys may appear by phone, out-of-custody defendants need not appear in court, in-custody will continue to appear via video in Judge Marlowe Sommer’s courtroom. Judge Ellington will be doing video now. Judge Lidyard will make a determination based on the availability of video.
    3. Presentment Hearings. Counsel may appear by phone.
    4. Probation Violation Arraignments. Attorneys may appear by phone. Defendants will continue to appear via video in Judge Marlowe Sommer’s courtroom. Judge Ellington will be doing video now. Judge Lidyard will make a determination based upon the availability of video.
    5. Probation status conferences. Attorneys may appear by phone. Out-of-custody defendants need not appear in court. In-custody defendants will continue to appear via video in Judge Marlowe Sommer’s courtroom. Judge Ellington will be doing video now. Judge Lidyard will make a determination based upon the availability of video.
    6. Arraignments. Attorneys may appear by phone, provided that there is a waiver signed by the defendant and conditions of release submitted to the court three days prior to arraignment. Arraignments will still be listed on the court’s docket and it is up to counsel to comply with this time deadline. These will be handled similar to presentment hearings in that the matter will be called to assure compliance and track the case. If there is not a waiver, then the state and defense counsel must appear, the out-of-custody defendant must appear, and the in-custody defendant must be transported. Transportation of an in-custody defendant is discouraged and defense attorneys are instructed to make all deliberate effort to comply with the time deadlines. The Court does not want in-custody or out-of custody defendants present in court simply because defense counsel was dilatory in getting the arraignment papers timely submitted.
    7. There are no longer Pretrial Conferences. They will stay on the court’s docket similar to arraignments and three days before the court’s docket, the attorneys must file a Certificate of Compliance that they have met and conferred, detailing the status of discovery and preparedness for trial. These will be handled similar to presentment hearings in that the matter will be called to assure compliance and track the case.
    8. Docket Calls. State and defense counsel may appear by phone. Out-of-custody defendants need not be present in court and in-custody will not be transported. If a continuance is requested, the temporary protocol is as follows: If the State is requesting a continuance then it will be held against the State. If Defendant is requesting a continuance then the Defendant must have a waiver of speedy trial rights signed by defendant submitted three days prior to Docket Call. If the parties are jointly a requesting a continuance it will be held neutral. If both parties wish to proceed to trial on that particular docket, the court will accommodate unless administrative necessity due to the coronavirus requires the court to set trial further out. If the parties dispute which side a continuance should be attributed to, it will be held neutrally, and the court will reconsider the matter at a later date upon a motion to reconsider.
    9. Release hearings under NMRA Rule 5-403. The rule entitles the defendant to be present. The court will not transport a defendant at the release hearing as a matter of course. Instead, counsel will confer before or at the scheduled hearing and with the court, determine whether the defendant may be released on conditions of release or an evidentiary hearing on the motion to revoke conditions of release is required. If a defendant wishes to assert his entitlement to be present at a release hearing, counsel must do a timely transport order.
    10. Release hearings under NMRA Rule 5-401. The court will not transport a defendant at the release hearing as a matter of course. Instead, counsel will confer before or at the scheduled hearing and with the court, determine defendant’s conditions of release.
  2. Evidentiary hearings such as preventative detention hearings, competency evaluation challenges, probation violation evidentiary hearings, revocation of conditions of release evidentiary hearings, motions to suppress, etc. – counsel must be present, probation officers must be present, electronic monitoring must be present, expert witnesses must be present or counsel must motion the court for telephonic appearance, and defendant must be present and in-custody will be transported. Counsel for the State and Defendant are directed to timely confer prior to a hearing to see if a stipulation which negates the need for an evidentiary hearing can be accomplished.
  3. When counsel and/or defendants appear in court the protocol is that all persons shall remain 6 feet apart. Therefore, the distance between counsel table and lecterns will be adjusted accordingly. Out-of-custody defendants will stay in the gallery and a microphone will be provided at the bannister. In-custody defendants will stay at the threshold leading into the courtroom from the secure area and a microphone will be set up for them.
  4. There will be no pleas taken extemporaneously. No plea will be set without a signed plea agreement and a request for change of plea. These should be entered in proposed text to alert the court.
  5. The Rio Arriba County Detention Center will have a video conference available Monday through Friday from 4:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. These are for attorney-client consultations. The Rio Arriba video for private defense counsel will be in Judge Marlowe Sommer’s conference room attached to her courtroom. There will need to be a schedule in place to accommodate counsel.
  6. The Santa Fe County Detention Center will have a video conference available Monday through Friday from ______________________. These are for attorney-client consultations. The Santa Fe video for private defense counsel will be in Judge Ellington’s conference room attached to his courtroom. There will need to be a schedule in place to accommodate counsel.
  7. Both the Rio Arriba County Detention Center and the Santa Fe County Detention Center will accommodate phone conferences between attorney and client on a daily basis.
  8. Grand juries that have already convened are suspended, until the District Attorney’s office submits a Petition to reconvene. The convening of further grand juries will be determined by the Court upon petition by the District Attorney.

Interpreter Scheduling

To avoid delay or the rescheduling of your hearing, you must notify the TCAA at 455-8290 or 455-8325 within 5 days of your scheduled hearing that an interpreter is needed.

Weather Delay & Closures

In the event of a two-hour delay or court closure due to adverse weather, all matters scheduled in the delay period will be vacated and rescheduled by the Court.

09/27/2021 Judge Jason Lidyard

8:00 AM D-117-CV-2020-00180 Benjamin P Lucas, et. al.,
v.
Jorge C Lucero
MOTION HEARING Real Estate

Comment: Motion for Summary Judgment

Plaintiff Lucas, Amalia P; Lucas, Benjamin P; Lucas, Peter Atty: Lutenegger, Toby
Defendant Lucero, Jorge C Atty: Sommer, Karl H.

9:00 AM D-117-CR-2021-00101 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Ralph, Rebecca Ann
ARRAIGNMENT Pepper, Sean Def Atty: Hay, Edward Craig, Iii
Comment: Reset

 

 

 

10:00 AM D-132-CV-2021-00002 Sirphey LLC
v.
Board of the County of Los Alamos, et. al.
HEARING Civil Appeals – Plaintiff Appellant

Comment: all pendings matters

Plaintiff Sirphey LLC Atty: Dabney, Philip J.
Defendant Board of the County of Los Alamos Atty: DeCandia, Donald A.

1:15 PM D-117-CR-2021-00102 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Tager, Geoffrey
ARRAIGNMENT Scheurmann, Aaron Joseph Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment: Reset

 

1:30 PM D-117-CR-2018-00098 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Ralph, Rebecca Ann
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE RODRIGUEZ, CRYSTAL Def Atty: Hay, Edward Craig, Iii
Comment:

 

1:30 PM D-101-CR-2017-00052 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Ralph, Rebecca Ann
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE RODRIGUEZ, CRYSTAL A Def Atty: Smith, Dorie Concetta Biagianti
Comment:

 

1:30 PM D-117-CR-2016-00182 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Ralph, Rebecca Ann
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE RODRIGUEZ, CRYSTAL A Def Atty: Hay, Edward Craig, Iii
Comment:

 

1:30 PM D-117-CR-2016-00068 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Ralph, Rebecca Ann
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE RODRIGUEZ, CRYSTAL Def Atty: Hay, Edward Craig, Iii
Comment:

 

1:45 PM D-117-CR-2014-00215 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Khalsa, Dev Atma S.
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Trujillo, Ryan Def Atty: Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca
Comment: custody in TA

 

1:45 PM D-117-CR-2015-00071 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Khalsa, Dev Atma S.
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Trujillo, Ryan Def Atty: Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca
Comment: custody in TA

 

1:45 PM D-117-CR-2015-00077 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Khalsa, Dev Atma S.
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Trujillo, Ryan Def Atty: Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca
Comment: custody in TA

 

1:45 PM D-117-CR-2016-00285 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Khalsa, Dev Atma S.
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Trujillo, Ryan Def Atty: Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca
Comment: custody in TA

 

1:45 PM D-117-CR-2016-00317 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Khalsa, Dev Atma S.
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Trujillo, Ryan Def Atty: Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca
Comment: custody in TA

 

 

 

 

2:00 PM D-117-CV-2021-00270 Melissa Sandoval
v.
Andrew Aragon
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING Miscellaneous Civil

Comment: Amended Temporary Restraining Order

Plaintiff Sandoval, Melissa Atty: Pro Se
Defendant Aragon, Andrew Atty:

2:30 PM D-117-CR-2017-00272 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Martin, Anastasia
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE MARTINEZ, ANTHONY Def Atty: Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca
Comment:

 

2:30 PM D-117-PD-2021-00009 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE Martinez, Marvin Def Atty: Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca
Comment:

 

2:30 PM D-117-PD-2021-00012 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE Martinez, Marvin Def Atty: Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca
Comment:

 

2:30 PM D-117-PD-2021-00011 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE Martinez, Marvin Def Atty: Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca
Comment:

 

2:30 PM D-117-PD-2021-00010 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Mnuk-Herrmann, Rebecca
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE Martinez, Marvin Def Atty:
Comment:

 

2:45 PM D-117-CR-2019-00286 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT DOMINGUEZ, ADAM Def Atty: Hay, Edward Craig, Iii
Comment: custody in TA

 

 

3:00 PM D-117-CV-2020-00202 Stephen Lawrence Fortess, et. al.,
v.
Smith & Nephew Inc, et. al.
PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE Tort Malpractice, Product Liability

Comment: and Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Compel

Plaintiff Fortess, Stephen Lawrence; Rivera Fortess, Debra Atty: Tinkler, Stephen E.
Defendant Castaldi, Justin; Harlan, Jason; JD Harlan & Associates Inc; Presbyterian Health Plan Inc; Presbyterian Healthcare Services; Presbyterian Insurance Company Inc; Presbyterian Network Inc; Smith & Nephew Inc; UnitedHealthCare of New Mexico Inc Atty: Walker, Alex Cameron; Allen, Meena H.

 

09/28/2021 Judge Jason Lidyard in Tierra Amarilla

8:00 AM D-117-CR-2020-00117 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Ahmed, Ihsan Uddin
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Quintana, Alfonso J Def Atty: Ruyle, Sam P.
Comment:

 

 

9:00 AM D-117-CR-2021-00044 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
MOTION HEARING Pena, Anthony Michael Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment: Motion for a Court Order to Release Personal Property

 

10:00 AM D-117-PD-2021-00019 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
Dangerousness Hearing Vigil, Dwight Def Atty: Hay, Edward Craig, Iii
Comment: In person hearing in TA

 

10:00 AM D-117-PD-2021-00020 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
Dangerousness Hearing Vigil, Dwight Def Atty: Hay, Edward Craig, Iii
Comment: In person hearing in TA

 

11:30 AM D-117-CR-2017-00214 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE LEYBA, JUSTIN Def Atty: Smith, Dorie Concetta Biagianti
Comment:

 

11:30 AM D-101-CR-2018-00131 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE Leyba, Justin Blas Def Atty: Smith, Dorie Concetta Biagianti
Comment:

 

11:30 AM D-117-CR-2018-00124 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Crum, Brittany
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE LEYBA, JUSTIN Def Atty: Smith, Dorie Concetta Biagianti
Comment: Reset

 

11:30 AM D-117-CR-2018-00052 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE LEYBA MOYA, JUSTIN Def Atty: Smith, Dorie Concetta Biagianti
Comment: Reset

 

11:30 AM D-117-CR-2017-00069 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Khalsa, Dev Atma S.
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE Quihuis, Christobal Def Atty: Smith, Dorie Concetta Biagianti
Comment:

 

11:30 AM D-117-CR-2018-00119 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Khalsa, Dev Atma S.
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE Quihuis, Christobal Def Atty: Smith, Dorie Concetta Biagianti
Comment:

 

1:00 PM D-117-PD-2021-00022 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
Dangerousness Hearing Martinez, Joshua Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment: and First Appearance, In person hearing in TA

 

1:45 PM D-117-PD-2021-00024 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
Dangerousness Hearing Naranjo, Jerome Nathan Def Atty:
Comment: Pretrial Detention and First Appearance-in person hearing in TA

 

1:45 PM D-117-PD-2021-00023 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
Dangerousness Hearing Naranjo, Jerome Nathan Def Atty:
Comment: Pretrial Detention and First Appearance, in person hearing in TA

 

2:30 PM D-117-CV-2021-00334 Jeanette Martinez
v.
LULA VALDEZ, et. al.
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING Miscellaneous Civil

Comment:

Plaintiff Martinez, Jeanette Atty: Pro Se
Defendant Valdez, Alyssa; Valdez, Angel; VALDEZ, LULA Atty:

 

 

09/29/2021 Judge Jason Lidyard

8:15 AM D-117-CR-2016-00244 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Khalsa, Dev Atma S.
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE Martinez, Julian N Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment:

 

8:30 AM D-117-PD-2021-00021 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
ARRAIGNMENT Lujan, Randy Patrick Def Atty: Silva, David R.
Comment:

 

9:00 AM D-117-CV-2020-00230 Jose Jaramillo
v.
North Central Solid Waste Authority
HEARING Miscellaneous Civil

Comment:

Plaintiff Jaramillo, Jose Atty: Thompkins, Nathaniel V.
Defendant North Central Solid Waste Authority Fuller, Peter Atty: Barela-gutierrez, Renee

1:00 PM D-117-CV-2021-00315 Beau Brunner, et. al.,
v.
Jeffrey Ray Johnson, II
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING Miscellaneous Civil

Comment:

Plaintiff Brunner, Beau; Brunner, Cierra Atty: Pro Se
Defendant Johnson, Jeffrey Ray, II Atty:

1:30 PM D-117-CV-2021-00317 Gilbert D Martinez, et. al.,
v.
David A Martinez
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING Miscellaneous Civil

Comment:

Plaintiff Martinez, Bernadette; Martinez, Gilbert D; Martinez, Lindsey L Atty: Pro Se
Defendant Martinez, David A Atty:

2:00 PM D-117-CV-2021-00319 ERNESTO VALDEZ
v.
Rachael Valdez
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING Miscellaneous Civil

Comment:

Plaintiff VALDEZ, ERNESTO Atty: Pro Se
Defendant Valdez, Rachael Atty:

2:30 PM D-117-CV-2021-00320 ERNESTO VALDEZ
v.
FLOYD M VALDEZ
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING Miscellaneous Civil

Comment:

Plaintiff VALDEZ, ERNESTO Atty: Pro Se
Defendant VALDEZ, FLOYD M Atty:

2:45 PM D-117-CV-2021-00328 Ernesto Valdez
v.
Monica Valdez
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING Miscellaneous Civil

Comment:

Plaintiff VALDEZ, ERNESTO Atty: Pro Se
Defendant Valdez, Monica Atty:

3:00 PM D-132-CV-2021-00030 Sheri Novak
v.
JOHN HALLADAY
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE Miscellaneous Civil

Comment:

Plaintiff Novak, Sheri Atty: Pro Se
Defendant HALLADAY, JOHN Atty:

 

09/30/2021 Judge Jason Lidyard in Tierra Amarilla

8:00 AM D-117-CR-2018-00285 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wood, B.Douglas, III
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT PEREZ, MARIO Def Atty: Ruyle, Sam P.
Comment: Custody in Sandoval Detention Center

 

8:00 AM D-101-CR-2018-00724 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Carrillo, Ramon M.
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT PEREZ, MARIO Def Atty: Ruyle, Sam P.
Comment: Custody at Sandoval County Detention Center

 

8:00 AM D-117-CR-2019-00089 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Huntley, John
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT PEREZ, MARIO Def Atty: Ruyle, Sam P.
Comment: Custody at Sandoval County Detention Center

 

8:15 AM D-132-CR-2018-00035 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Breen, Larissa
STATUS CONFERENCE HENINS, MARK Def Atty:
Comment:

 

8:30 AM D-117-CR-2006-00126 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Salazar, Antonio Juan
WRIT HEARING BIRD, SHAWN Def Atty: Grubesic, John T.
Comment: Writ of Certiorari

 

9:00 AM D-117-CR-2018-00060 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT GALVAN, VICTOR Def Atty: Plummer, James S.
Comment: Custody in Bernalillo

 

9:00 AM D-117-CR-2019-00230 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Galvan, Victor Juan Def Atty: Ruyle, Sam P.
Comment: Custody in Bernalillo

 

9:00 AM D-117-CR-2019-00229 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Galvan, Victor Juan Def Atty: Plummer, James S.
Comment:

 

9:15 AM D-117-CR-2019-00305 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wood, B.Douglas, III
STATUS CONFERENCE GONZALES, NICHOLAS Def Atty: Hay, Edward Craig, Iii
Comment:

 

9:30 AM D-117-PD-2021-00014 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
ARRAIGNMENT Abeyta, Bradley Def Atty: Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca
Comment:

 

1:00 PM D-117-CR-2019-00083 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Schumacher Smithkier, Allison Jane
PLEA CONFERENCE Padilla, Leonard Def Atty: Smith, Dorie Concetta Biagianti
Comment: In person hearing in TA

 

1:30 PM D-117-CR-2020-00096 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Ahmed, Ihsan Uddin
PLEA CONFERENCE Sanchez, Danny Def Atty: Hay, Edward Craig, Iii
Comment: Remote hearing

 

2:00 PM D-117-CR-2021-00012 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wood, B.Douglas, III
PLEA CONFERENCE WILLIAMS, ROBBIE CURTIS Def Atty: Plummer, James S.
Comment: Reset-in person hearing in TA

 

2:00 PM D-117-CR-2020-00037 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Breen, Larissa
PLEA CONFERENCE WILLIAMS, ROBBIE Def Atty: Plummer, James S.
Comment: Reset-in person hearing in TA

 

3:00 PM D-117-CR-2020-00086 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty:
PLEA CONFERENCE Atencio, Fabian William Def Atty: Plummer, James S.
Comment: In person hearing in TA

 

3:00 PM D-117-CR-2020-00068 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wood, B.Douglas, III
PLEA CONFERENCE Atencio, Fabian William Def Atty: Plummer, James S.
Comment: In person hearing in TA

 

3:30 PM D-117-CR-2019-00136 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Ahmed, Ihsan Uddin
PLEA CONFERENCE Abeyta, Andrew A Def Atty: Assed, Ahmad
Comment: In person hearing in TA-custody in TA

 

4:00 PM D-117-PD-2021-00025 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
Dangerousness Hearing Edmonds, Christopher Def Atty:
Comment: Pretrial Detention and First Appearance, in person hearing in TA-custody in TA

 

 

10/01/2021 Judge Jason Lidyard

8:00 AM D-117-CV-2021-00321 Josephine S Gasca, et. al.,
v.
Jerry E Velarde
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING Miscellaneous Civil

Comment:

Plaintiff Gasca, Jacob A, Sr.; Gasca, Josephine S Atty: Pro Se
Defendant Velarde, Jerry E Atty:

8:30 AM D-117-CV-2019-00382 US Bank National Association
v.
Cora E Montoya, et. al.
MOTION HEARING Real Estate

Comment: Motion for Default Judgment

Plaintiff US Bank National Association Atty: Eckels, James P.
Defendant Beneficial New Mexico Inc; Montoya, Cora E; North Central Solid Waste Authority; Unknown Heirs Devisees or Legatees of Deluvina Cordova; Unknown Heirs Devisees or Legatees of Eluid Cordova; Unknown Spouse of Cora Montoya Atty:

9:00 AM D-117-CR-2019-00306 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Etcitty, Karen Kingen
MOTION HEARING Deaguero, Jerome Def Atty: Mnuk-herrmann, Rebecca
Comment:

 

10:00 AM D-117-CR-2009-00157 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Schumacher Smithkier, Allison Jane
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE FRESQUEZ, LEROY Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment:

 

10:30 AM D-132-CV-2021-00052 In The Matter Of The Name Change of Jazmin Marie Martinez
NAME CHANGE HEARING Name Change

Comment:

Plaintiff Martinez, Jazmin Marie Atty:
Defendant Atty:

11:00 AM D-117-CR-2021-00040 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Long, Anthony Wade
EVIDENTIARY HEARING SANDOVAL, ELMO JULIAN Def Atty: West, Sydney K.l.
Comment:

 

 

1:00 PM D-117-CV-2021-00311 Roxanne Gasca
v.
Jerry E Velarde
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING Miscellaneous Civil

Comment:

Plaintiff Gasca, Roxanne Atty: Pro Se
Defendant Velarde, Jerry E Atty:

1:30 PM D-117-CV-2021-00331 Anthony Martinez, et. al.,
v.
Stephanie Herrera
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING Miscellaneous Civil

Comment:

Plaintiff Gutierrez, Shyanne; Martinez, Anthony; Martinez, Jaylene; Martinez, Jazlynn Atty: Pro Se
Defendant Herrera, Stephanie Atty:

2:00 PM D-117-CR-2018-00162 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Martin, Anastasia
HEARING Gage, Roger L Def Atty: Clark, Thomas M.
Comment: Hearing on Supplemental Questionnair