Judge T. Glenn Ellington

Last Updated: 9/26/2021

In-Person Hearings

Pursuant to the New Mexico Supreme Court Order No. 21-8500-015 effective July 19, 2021, the following types of hearings will be conducted in person, absent a court order requiring remote proceedings:

1) Pretrial Detention, or Dangerousness Hearings 2) Preliminary Examinations or Preliminary Hearings, 3) Competency Evidentiary hearings, 4) Pleas (only for current case, no PV in-custody pleas), 5) Sentencing (only for current case, no PV in-custody pleas), 6) Bench Trials (lower court appeals and jury trials that turn into bench trials), 7) Probation Violation (evidentiary hearings only for out of custody and jail time sought – No Status – in custody do not come for status, evidentiary hearings, pleas or sentencing).  Parties may request in person and such requests are subject to approval of the presiding judge and the chief judge.

NOTICE ON REMOTE ACCESS TO COURT PROCEEDINGS

Judge T. Glenn Ellington will be utilizing Google Meet for remote access to all other hearings, the information is as follows:

For Video Access: https://meet.google.com/kaq-neuk-zjs

For Telephone Access: 1-316-975-0121‬ PIN: ‪124 177 127‬#

UPDATE

Dear attorneys:

The criminal judges in the First Judicial District Court have established the following general protocols. These may change as appropriate and we will certainly advise you immediately of any changes.

1. Attorneys may appear by phone and their clients need not be present in court for the following hearings, subject to the conditions stated:
   1. Attorneys must make an email request in writing to the Judge’s TCAA at least 24 hours in advance, which email must contain the telephone number at which the attorney can be reached. Attorneys must be available at least five minutes before the scheduled hearing and continue to be available until the attorney receives a telephone call from the Court.
   2. Status conference on competency evaluations. Attorneys may appear by phone, out-of-custody defendants need not appear in court, in-custody will continue to appear via video in Judge Marlowe Sommer’s courtroom. Judge Ellington will be doing video now. Judge Lidyard will make a determination based on the availability of video.
   3. Presentment Hearings. Counsel may appear by phone.
   4. Probation Violation Arraignments. Attorneys may appear by phone. Defendants will continue to appear via video in Judge Marlowe Sommer’s courtroom. Judge Ellington will be doing video now. Judge Lidyard will make a determination based upon the availability of video.
   5. Probation status conferences. Attorneys may appear by phone. Out-of-custody defendants need not appear in court. In-custody defendants will continue to appear via video in Judge Marlowe Sommer’s courtroom. Judge Ellington will be doing video now. Judge Lidyard will make a determination based upon the availability of video.
   6. Arraignments. Attorneys may appear by phone, provided that there is a waiver signed by the defendant and conditions of release submitted to the court three days prior to arraignment. Arraignments will still be listed on the court’s docket and it is up to counsel to comply with this time deadline. These will be handled similar to presentment hearings in that the matter will be called to assure compliance and track the case. If there is not a waiver, then the state and defense counsel must appear, the out-of-custody defendant must appear, and the in-custody defendant must be transported. Transportation of an in-custody defendant is discouraged and defense attorneys are instructed to make all deliberate effort to comply with the time deadlines. The Court does not want in-custody or out-of custody defendants present in court simply because defense counsel was dilatory in getting the arraignment papers timely submitted.
   7. There are no longer Pretrial Conferences. They will stay on the court’s docket similar to arraignments and three days before the court’s docket, the attorneys must file a Certificate of Compliance that they have met and conferred, detailing the status of discovery and preparedness for trial. These will be handled similar to presentment hearings in that the matter will be called to assure compliance and track the case.
   8. Docket Calls. State and defense counsel may appear by phone. Out-of-custody defendants need not be present in court and in-custody will not be transported. If a continuance is requested, the temporary protocol is as follows: If the State is requesting a continuance then it will be held against the State. If Defendant is requesting a continuance then the Defendant must have a waiver of speedy trial rights signed by defendant submitted three days prior to Docket Call. If the parties are jointly a requesting a continuance it will be held neutral. If both parties wish to proceed to trial on that particular docket, the court will accommodate unless administrative necessity due to the coronavirus requires the court to set trial further out. If the parties dispute which side a continuance should be attributed to, it will be held neutrally, and the court will reconsider the matter at a later date upon a motion to reconsider.
   9. Release hearings under NMRA Rule 5-403. The rule entitles the defendant to be present. The court will not transport a defendant at the release hearing as a matter of course. Instead, counsel will confer before or at the scheduled hearing and with the court, determine whether the defendant may be released on conditions of release or an evidentiary hearing on the motion to revoke conditions of release is required. If a defendant wishes to assert his entitlement to be present at a release hearing, counsel must do a timely transport order.
   10. Release hearings under NMRA Rule 5-401. The court will not transport a defendant at the release hearing as a matter of course. Instead, counsel will confer before or at the scheduled hearing and with the court, determine defendant’s conditions of release.
2. Evidentiary hearings such as preventative detention hearings, competency evaluation challenges, probation violation evidentiary hearings, revocation of conditions of release evidentiary hearings, motions to suppress, etc. – counsel must be present, probation officers must be present, electronic monitoring must be present, expert witnesses must be present or counsel must motion the court for telephonic appearance, and defendant must be present and in-custody will be transported. Counsel for the State and Defendant are directed to timely confer prior to a hearing to see if a stipulation which negates the need for an evidentiary hearing can be accomplished.
3. When counsel and/or defendants appear in court the protocol is that all persons shall remain 6 feet apart. Therefore, the distance between counsel table and lecterns will be adjusted accordingly. Out-of-custody defendants will stay in the gallery and a microphone will be provided at the banister. In-custody defendants will stay at the threshold leading into the courtroom from the secure area and a microphone will be set up for them.
4. There will be no pleas taken extemporaneously. No plea will be set without a signed plea agreement and a request for change of plea. These should be entered in proposed text to alert the court.
5. The Rio Arriba County Detention Center will have a video conference available Monday through Friday from 4:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. These are for attorney-client consultations. The Rio Arriba video for private defense counsel will be in Judge Marlowe Sommer’s conference room attached to her courtroom. There will need to be a schedule in place to accommodate counsel.
6. The Santa Fe County Detention Center will have a video conference available Monday through Friday from ______________________. These are for attorney-client consultations. The Santa Fe video for private defense counsel will be in Judge Ellington’s conference room attached to his courtroom. There will need to be a schedule in place to accommodate counsel.
7. Both the Rio Arriba County Detention Center and the Santa Fe County Detention Center will accommodate phone conferences between attorney and client on a daily basis.
8. Grand juries that have already convened are suspended, until the District Attorney’s office submits a Petition to reconvene. The convening of further grand juries will be determined by the Court upon petition by the District Attorney.

Weather Delays and Closures

In the event of a weather delay, the courthouse will open at 10:00 am.

Due to time constraints with the Adult Detention Center and the ability to have remote access hearings, a weather delay will not affect the time that the hearings are heard. Division 7 hearings will take place at their scheduled time regardless of any announced First Judicial District Court delay. The Judge will hear all cases for that morning in the order that they are scheduled with no change.

If the Court is closed on the day you have a scheduled hearing, your hearing will be rescheduled and noticed by the Court.

All delays or closures will be reported to the major news stations, KOAT, KOB and KRQE and our website will be updated.

Interpreter Scheduling

To avoid delay or the rescheduling of your hearing, you must notify the TCAA at 455-8180 within 5 days of your scheduled hearing that an interpreter is needed.

09/27/2021 8:00 AM Judge T. Glenn Ellington General Session

8:10 AM D-101-CR-2019-00145 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
Competency Review Hearing Hart, Jonathan Def Atty:
Comment:

 

8:10 AM D-101-CR-2020-00446 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
Competency Review Hearing GARCIA, FLORENTINO Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

8:10 AM D-101-CR-2021-00214 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Carrillo, Ramon M.
Competency Review Hearing Hart, Jonathan Def Atty: Kerr, Liane E.
Comment:

 

8:10 AM D-101-CR-2021-00109 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
Competency Review Hearing Hart, Jonathan Def Atty: Kerr, Liane E.
Comment:

 

8:10 AM D-101-CR-2019-00852 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
Competency Review Hearing Hart, Jonathan Def Atty:
Comment:

 

8:15 AM D-101-CR-2020-00374 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Stuart, Lindsay
DOCKET CALL Jimemenz, Anthony Def Atty: Ruyle, Sam P.
Comment:

 

8:15 AM D-101-CR-2019-00374 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
DOCKET CALL Rios, Benedicto, III Def Atty: Esquibel, Diego Roman
Comment:

 

8:20 AM D-101-CR-2021-00262 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Stuart, Lindsay
RELEASE HEARING MEDINA, KEVIN J Def Atty:
Comment: Picked up on PD202149 warrant- Case closed

 

8:20 AM D-101-CR-2021-00198 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Gallardo, Julie M.
RELEASE HEARING SANDOVAL, LEONARD Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

8:20 AM D-101-CR-2020-00117 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Warren, Russell S., III
RELEASE HEARING MARTINEZ, CONSUELO Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment: RADC – Transport to SFDC

 

8:20 AM D-101-CR-2020-00342 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Jenkins, David
RELEASE HEARING Gallegos, David Def Atty: Burrill, Jennifer J.
Comment:

 

8:20 AM D-101-CR-2021-00227 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
RELEASE HEARING GARCIA, JULIAN Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

8:25 AM D-101-CR-2020-00031 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
EVIDENTIARY HEARING MADRID, JOSEPH P Def Atty: Whitley, L. Val
Comment:

 

8:25 AM D-101-CR-2019-00365 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
EVIDENTIARY HEARING MADRID, JOSEPH P Def Atty: Whitley, L. Val
Comment:

 

8:25 AM D-101-CR-2020-00230 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Warren, Russell S., III
EVIDENTIARY HEARING Schaefer, Matthew Def Atty: Ruyle, Sam P.
Comment:

 

8:25 AM D-101-CR-2021-00091 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
EVIDENTIARY HEARING DECKER, DAVID Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

8:25 AM D-101-CR-2019-00820 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Gallardo, Julie M.
EVIDENTIARY HEARING BARELA, GILBERT P. Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2019-00813 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE Roybal, Rachel A. Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2018-00561 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE Sanchez, Jesus Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-117-CR-2019-00119 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE SANCHEZ, CARLOS Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2019-00268 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE SANCHEZ, CARLOS Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2020-00112 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE FAVA, JONATHAN Def Atty: Whitley, L. Val
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2018-00811 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE SANCHEZ, CARLOS Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2018-00278 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE Walsh, Alton B Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2016-00376 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Sanchez, Estevan
STATUS CONFERENCE CHAVEZ, RICK Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2019-00104 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE CARPENTER, RACHEL K Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2018-00345 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE MARTINEZ, FRANK A Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2020-00215 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Stuart, Lindsay
STATUS CONFERENCE ESPINOZA, FERNANDO Def Atty: Plummer, James S.
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2020-00098 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE Molinar, Paulino Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2019-00122 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Garcia, Vanessa E
STATUS CONFERENCE Varos, Elizario T. Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2018-00157 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE Moore, James R, Jr. Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2020-00155 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE Larranaga Archuleta, Roberta Isidora Def Atty: Dickson, Mark
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2018-00765 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE Quintana, Dominic Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

8:29 AM D-101-CR-2018-00163 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE Baca, John E Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

8:30 AM D-101-CR-2020-00465 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cervantes, Alyssa C.
DOCKET CALL Sanders, Christoper Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

8:30 AM D-101-CR-2021-00090 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
DOCKET CALL Hoel, Isaac Def Atty: Whitley, L. Val
Comment:

 

9:00 AM D-101-CR-2020-00351 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Murphy, Haley Winn
STATUS CONFERENCE Arenas Gaytan, Alberto Def Atty: Whitley, L. Val
Comment:

 

9:30 AM D-117-CR-2016-00008 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT SERNA, JAVIER R Def Atty: Plummer, James S.
Comment:

 

9:30 AM D-101-CR-2016-00301 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Serna, Javier Ricky Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

9:30 AM D-101-CR-2020-00365 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Velasquez, Andrew A Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment: NO 9/140 Served 9/14- Video – SFDC

 

9:30 AM D-101-CR-2019-00838 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wahlquist, Kent
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT SALVIDREZ, STEPHANIE Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

9:30 AM D-117-CR-2020-00095 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Martinez, Joshua Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment:

 

9:30 AM D-117-CR-2019-00290 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Martinez, Joshua Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment:

 

9:30 AM D-101-CR-2020-00259 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Martinez, Joshua Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment:

 

9:30 AM D-101-CR-2019-00299 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
PROBATION VIOLATION ARRAIGNMENT Martinez, Joshua Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment:

 

10:00 AM D-101-CR-2021-00097 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
MOTION HEARING Espinoza, Miguel Thomas, Jr. Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment: Motion to Modify Conditions of Release

 

1:00 PM D-101-CR-2021-00068 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cervantes, Alyssa C.
SENTENCING HEARING Pacheco, Richard Paul Def Atty: Silva, David R.
Comment:

 

1:45 PM D-101-CR-2021-00291 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Stuart, Lindsay
ARRAIGNMENT Medina, Melcin Corado Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

1:45 PM D-101-CR-2021-00243 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Warren, Russell S., III
ARRAIGNMENT Enriquez Portillo, Nancy Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

2:00 PM D-101-PD-2021-00064 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Palomino, John L.
PRELIMINARY HEARING Alire, Andres Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

2:00 PM D-101-PD-2021-00064 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Palomino, John L.
Dangerousness Hearing Alire, Andres Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

 

09/28/2021 8:00 AM Judge T. Glenn Ellington General Session

8:30 AM D-101-JR-2021-00037 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
STATUS CONFERENCE Madrid, Christian Def Atty: Dickson, Mark
Comment:

 

8:30 AM D-101-JR-2021-00036 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
STATUS CONFERENCE Vigil, Jacob Ruben Def Atty: Landrum, Hal B., Jr.
Comment:

 

8:45 AM D-101-CR-2020-00408 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
PLEA CONFERENCE HERRERA, ANTONIO Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

9:00 AM D-101-CR-2020-00215 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Stuart, Lindsay
PLEA CONFERENCE ESPINOZA, FERNANDO Def Atty: Plummer, James S.
Comment:

 

9:30 AM D-101-CR-2020-00349 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Jenkins, David
PLEA CONFERENCE VARELA, JONATHAN Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

9:30 AM D-101-CR-2021-00163 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Jenkins, David
PLEA CONFERENCE VARELA, JONATHAN Def Atty:
Comment:

 

9:45 AM D-101-CR-2021-00053 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Gallardo, Julie M.
PLEA CONFERENCE GEIER, DANIEL Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

10:00 AM D-101-CR-2017-00271 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
PLEA CONFERENCE JINZO, ANGELINA Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

10:15 AM D-117-JR-2021-00011 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
STATUS CONFERENCE Garcia, Kenneth Def Atty:
Comment:

 

10:15 AM D-101-JR-2020-00028 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
STATUS CONFERENCE Alonso, Itzel Def Atty: Dickson, Mark
Comment:

 

10:15 AM D-117-JR-2021-00010 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
STATUS CONFERENCE Lueras, Ruby Def Atty: Dickson, Mark
Comment:

 

10:15 AM D-101-JR-2021-00041 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
STATUS CONFERENCE Tenorio, Miles Def Atty:
Comment:

 

10:15 AM D-101-JR-2021-00042 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
STATUS CONFERENCE Ingram, Isaiah Def Atty: Dickson, Mark
Comment:

 

10:30 AM D-101-JR-2021-00035 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
Competency Review Hearing Vigil, Raymon Def Atty: Dickson, Mark
Comment:

 

10:45 AM D-101-CR-2020-00483 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty:
PLEA CONFERENCE Miramontes, Daniella Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment:

 

11:00 AM D-101-CR-2019-00772 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Carrillo, Ramon M.
PLEA CONFERENCE Garcia, Jose Alejandro Def Atty: Ruyle, Sam P.
Comment:

 

11:00 AM D-101-CR-2019-00746 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Carrillo, Ramon M.
PLEA CONFERENCE Garcia, Jose Alejandro Def Atty: Ruyle, Sam P.
Comment:

 

11:00 AM D-101-CR-2019-00687 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Carrillo, Ramon M.
PLEA CONFERENCE Garcia, Jose Alejandro Def Atty: Leavell, Julita Ann
Comment:

 

11:30 AM D-101-CR-2020-00382 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
PLEA CONFERENCE BARTON, MICHAEL Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment: IN PERSON

 

11:45 AM D-101-CR-2021-00002 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cervantes, Alyssa C.
PLEA CONFERENCE Padilla, Eli V Def Atty: Aarons, Stephen D.
Comment:

 

1:15 PM D-101-EX-2021-00030 ** Confidential **
HEARING Criminal Record Expungement

Comment: EXPUNGEMENT OF RECORDS

Plaintiff ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** Atty: ** Confidential **
Defendant ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** ** Confidential ** Atty:

1:30 PM D-101-CR-2020-00291 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty:
PLEA CONFERENCE ROMERO, MIGUEL Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment: At Lea County- Stipulation to do by VIDEO – NO TRANSPORT NEEDED

 

1:45 PM D-101-CR-2016-00253 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE RIVERA, JARED B Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

1:45 PM D-101-CR-2016-00642 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE RIVERA, JARED B Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

1:45 PM D-101-CR-2017-00258 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE RIVERA, JARED B Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

1:45 PM D-101-CR-2017-00445 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
STATUS CONFERENCE RIVERA, JARED B Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

2:00 PM D-101-CR-2020-00386 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Jenkins, David
PLEA CONFERENCE Tapia, Henry Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

2:15 PM D-101-CR-2021-00186 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
PLEA CONFERENCE Ornelas, Ricardo, Jr. Def Atty: Clark, Thomas M.
Comment: IN PERSON

 

2:30 PM D-101-CR-2018-00619 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Wesley, Evan N.
PLEA CONFERENCE Campbell, Jeffrey C Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment:

 

2:30 PM D-101-CR-2019-00534 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cortesi, Nancy Ann
PLEA CONFERENCE Campbell, Jeffery C Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment:

 

2:30 PM D-101-CR-2020-00489 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
PLEA CONFERENCE Eich, Tylor Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment: IN PERSON

 

2:45 PM D-101-CR-2021-00260 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cervantes, Alyssa C.
PLEA CONFERENCE Clifford, Terrance Anthony Def Atty: Burrill, Jennifer J.
Comment:

 

3:00 PM D-101-CR-2021-00046 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Carrillo, Ramon M.
PLEA CONFERENCE Valdez, Alexis Def Atty: Burrill, Jennifer J.
Comment:

 

3:00 PM D-101-CR-2021-00057 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
PLEA CONFERENCE Valdez, Alexis Def Atty: Burrill, Jennifer J.
Comment:

 

3:00 PM D-101-CR-2021-00058 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
PLEA CONFERENCE Valdez, Alexis Def Atty: Burrill, Jennifer J.
Comment:

 

3:00 PM D-101-CR-2021-00059 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Carrillo, Ramon M.
PLEA CONFERENCE Valdez, Alexis Def Atty: Burrill, Jennifer J.
Comment:

 

3:15 PM D-101-CR-2020-00340 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Cervantes, Alyssa C.
PLEA CONFERENCE Gregory, Cody Lee-Zinn Def Atty: Rassoul, Shaheen
Comment:

 

3:30 PM D-101-CR-2021-00147 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Stuart, Lindsay
PLEA CONFERENCE CALABAZA, PHYLLIS Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment:

 

3:30 PM D-101-CR-2021-00069 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Shapiro, David
PLEA CONFERENCE CALABAZA, PHYLLIS M Def Atty: Jones, Michael R.
Comment:

 

 

09/29/2021 8:00 AM Judge T. Glenn Ellington General Session

10:00 AM D-101-CV-2021-02033 In The Matter Of Santa Fe County
HEARING Election Code

Comment:

Plaintiff Santa Fe County Atty:
Defendant Atty:

10:30 AM D-101-CR-2017-00363 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Nichols, Blake F.
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE Herburger, Tom Def Atty: Solomon, Jasmine Jade
Comment:

 

 

09/30/2021 8:00 AM Judge T. Glenn Ellington General Session

8:30 AM D-117-JR-2021-00012 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
FIRST APPEARANCE (JUV) HEARING Bird, Kylie Def Atty:
Comment:

 

8:45 AM D-101-CR-2021-00046 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Carrillo, Ramon M.
FIRST APPEARANCE (JUV) HEARING Valdez, Alexis Def Atty: Burrill, Jennifer J.
Comment:

 

9:00 AM D-101-JR-2021-00047 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
FIRST APPEARANCE (JUV) HEARING Perez, Jesus Ernesto, Jr. Def Atty:
Comment:

 

9:15 AM D-132-JR-2021-00005 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
FIRST APPEARANCE (JUV) HEARING Walker, Aiden Def Atty:
Comment:

 

9:30 AM D-132-JR-2021-00004 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
FIRST APPEARANCE (JUV) HEARING Enrriquez Marquez, Jesus Def Atty:
Comment:

 

9:45 AM D-101-JR-2021-00044 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
FIRST APPEARANCE (JUV) HEARING Arroyo, Daniel Def Atty:
Comment:

 

10:00 AM D-101-JR-2021-00046 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
FIRST APPEARANCE (JUV) HEARING Schober, Brandon Joshua Def Atty:
Comment:

 

 

10:15 AM D-101-JR-2021-00004 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty: Smallwood, Heather Renee
STATUS HEARING/ CONFERENCE Beard, Riley Def Atty: Smith, Dorie Concetta Biagianti
Comment: Review Hearing

 

1:30 PM D-101-LR-2021-00009 State of New Mexico vs Pros Atty:
NON JURY TRIAL Roybal, Karen Def Atty: Snowden, William H.
Comment: